Since the dawn of time (or LinkedIn), we’ve treated the CEO’s LinkedIn profile as something separate from the company’s wider brand presence.
The company website belongs to marketing. Media coverage belongs to PR. LinkedIn belongs to… whoever can persuade the CEO to post something this month.
That distinction is getting harder to defend.
AI search is changing how people discover businesses, research suppliers and work out who they trust. Increasingly, the information shaping those answers isn’t only coming from your website or your company LinkedIn page.
It’s coming from people.
That means the personal brands of your senior leaders are starting to become part of your company’s search presence.
I think that should change how B2B businesses think about LinkedIn completely.
TL;DR
- LinkedIn is becoming an important source for AI search, with individual profiles cited more often than company pages.
- A senior leader’s expertise can strengthen how people and AI tools understand your business, even when their posts receive modest engagement.
- The strongest content offers specific, useful insight in a recognisably human voice, rather than repeating company messaging.
- Treat leadership LinkedIn activity as part of your wider PR and reputation strategy, with clear areas of expertise for each person to own.
The best LinkedIn metric might be the one you can’t see
We’re used to judging LinkedIn content using visible numbers, impressions, engagement, followers, clicks.
They’re useful signals, but they don’t tell us the whole story anymore.
Meltwater recently analysed 9.5 million citations across six major AI platforms and found LinkedIn was the second most-cited source overall, behind YouTube. Around 75% of those LinkedIn citations came from individual member profiles rather than company pages.
Perhaps more interestingly, 51% came from people with fewer than 10,000 followers.
That suggests expertise can travel much further than the audience you see underneath a post.
A CEO might publish something that gets a perfectly respectable 20 likes and no viral fanfare whatsoever. But if that post clearly answers a question your customers are asking, explains something useful or demonstrates genuine expertise, its value might extend well beyond those visible engagement numbers.
It can become another piece of evidence helping search engines and AI tools understand:
- what your company knows about
- who its experts are
- what subjects they have authority on
- how your business should be described
That makes follower count a considerably less interesting measure of influence.
Your CEO shouldn’t sound like your company page
This is also why I think we need to get much better at separating brand consistency from everyone sounding exactly the same.
Your company page has a job. Your CEO has another.
If both accounts are publishing the same carefully polished copy, using the same phrases and making the same announcements, you’re wasting one of them.
People follow people because they want perspective.
Journalists do too. LinkedIn can act as a quick credibility check, helping them work out whether a potential spokesperson is a genuine expert with a real point of view, rather than just another AI-polished profile.
Your audience want the story behind the decision, the thing you learned after getting something wrong, the opinion you’ve developed after 20 years in an industry or the issue everyone else in your sector seems reluctant to talk about.
Conveniently, that’s also the type of content that demonstrates expertise.
Meltwater’s research found that AI citations were driven more by relevance, specificity and usefulness than sheer popularity. Clear explanations, named examples, data and structured information were particularly common among highly cited LinkedIn content.
That doesn’t mean every CEO needs to start writing SEO-friendly LinkedIn listicles. (Please don’t).
It means they need to say something worth finding.
A CEO who sounds like a press release is adding very little that the company website couldn’t already provide.
A CEO who regularly shares specific knowledge, experience and opinions is creating a completely different source of information about the business.
Personal brand is becoming company search presence
We still tend to think of personal branding as something that primarily benefits the individual.
More followers, more speaking opportunities and a bigger professional profile.
All true, in fairness.
But if your CEO, MD or technical expert becomes strongly associated with a particular topic, that association doesn’t stop with them.
Their job title, employer, expertise and content all connect back to the organisation.
So, when someone asks an AI tool a question connected to your industry, the information associated with your employees can potentially help shape how your company appears in that answer.
Meltwater’s latest AI visibility tracking also shows LinkedIn continuing to grow as an AI citation source, particularly for professional topics, business content and social proof.
Suddenly, the question isn’t: ‘Should our CEO post more on LinkedIn?’
It becomes: ‘What do we want our company’s experts to be known for?’
LinkedIn, PR and AI search are becoming the same reputation problem
This is also why I think treating LinkedIn as the ‘social bit’ at the end of a PR strategy is increasingly outdated.
PR has always been about shaping what people find when they go looking for information about a business.
You build third-party credibility, put experts into relevant conversations, make sure your brand is associated with the subjects it wants to own. You give journalists, customers and stakeholders enough evidence to trust what you’re saying.
In the age of AI, that there is now another audience consuming all that information.
AI tools can draw from your website, media coverage, LinkedIn posts, reviews, forums and other public sources to decide how to answer a question about your business or your industry.
That makes the boundaries between SEO, PR, social media and reputation considerably blurrier.
A strong piece of media coverage can influence search. A useful LinkedIn post can influence AI visibility.
A CEO’s public reputation can influence how the company is understood.
These aren’t completely separate marketing activities anymore. They’re all signals.
So, is your CEO’s LinkedIn profile a brand asset?
I think increasingly, yes.
That doesn’t mean marketing should wrestle control of it away from them. In fact, that would defeat the point.
The opportunity is to treat senior leaders as genuine expert voices within the wider brand strategy.
Help them identify the subjects they can credibly own. Give them evidence, ideas and useful prompts.Connect their content to the conversations your PR and marketing teams are already trying to lead.
Then give them enough freedom to sound like themselves.
The businesses that benefit most from this probably won’t be the ones with the most polished executive LinkedIn programmes.
They’ll be the ones whose experts have consistently put enough useful thinking into the public domain that, when someone asks a question about their industry, both people and machines know exactly who knows their stuff.
Five things you can do now to strengthen your SLT’s LinkedIn presence
You don’t need to turn every senior leader into a full-time content creator. A few simple changes can make their LinkedIn presence much more useful to your audience and to search.
1. Decide what you want each person to be known for
Give each senior leader two or three clear areas of expertise that connect naturally to their role and your wider business strategy.
The aim isn’t to restrict what they can talk about. It’s to build enough consistency that people, journalists and AI tools can understand what they know.
2. Make sure their profile reflects that expertise
Check their headline, About section and experience.
If someone is your expert on workplace culture, sustainability or cybersecurity, for example, their profile should make that obvious without someone having to dig for it.
3. Give them something useful to say
The strongest leadership content comes from real experience.
Use customer conversations, industry changes, research, media questions, internal discussions and lessons learned as prompts. Your job is to help uncover the opinion, not manufacture one for them.
4. Let them sound like themselves
Avoid copying company-page posts onto personal profiles.
A senior leader’s value comes from their perspective, experience and personality. Give them support with structure and ideas but leave enough room for their personality to come through.
5. Make visibility part of your wider PR strategy
Think about LinkedIn alongside media relations, thought leadership and search rather than as a separate social media task.
If you want a spokesperson to be known for a particular subject, make sure the expertise they share in interviews, articles and events is also visible on their LinkedIn profile.
The goal isn’t to post more.
It’s to leave a clear enough trail of useful, credible expertise that when somebody, or something, goes looking for an expert in your space, your people are easy to find.
To find out more about Midnight’s LinkedIn services, click here.
Take our free LinkedIn scorecard quiz – just 3 to 5 minutes for immediate, expert feedback and a custom plan to improve your LinkedIn performance.
